Portofino → Trieste
Today's conditions on this route
- 327 g/kWh
- 33% renewable
- 19°C · normal
- 327 g/kWh
- 33% renewable
- 14°C · normal
Grid: energy-charts · Weather: open-meteo.com
按天气条件的续航
在正常天气下，24 款电动车中有 24 款可完成此路线。其估算充电停靠点为 1 至 5 次（中位数 1）。
请在上方选择车辆以查看天气调整后的续航。
Assumptions behind these numbers
- Model assumptionStart charge 100%, arrive with 15% in reserve, charge up to 80% at each stop.
- Model assumptionUsable battery: 100% of each vehicle's listed capacity (the listed capacity may be gross or net; no correction is applied).
- Model assumptionSpeed: consumption starts from each vehicle's listed real-world efficiency, times a speed factor of 1.00 (1.00 = no speed adjustment).
- Vehicle dataWeather: each vehicle uses its own hot, normal and cold factor from our vehicle data, so consumption = efficiency x 1.00 / factor. Hot is 25 °C and above, normal is 10-25 °C, cold is below 10 °C.
- Model assumptionCharging speed: average power = min(vehicle peak kW, 150 kW cap) x 0.60 taper, plus 5 min per stop.
- MethodRange, energy and cost all use the same consumption figure. Energy is measured at the battery; charging losses are not included.
- MethodCharging stops are estimated from range and the charging window. They are not verified charging stations.
- Market dataCost: estimated energy cost at the average electricity market price for Italy, day-ahead market, as of 18 Oct 2026 (0.229 EUR/kWh); public charging tariffs are usually higher.
- Market dataCO2: energy x grid average carbon intensity of 327 g/kWh (Italy, energy-charts, as of 18 Oct 2026).
Italy更多电动车路线
查看所有Italy路线 →路线分析
The 571-kilometre drive from Portofino to Trieste, with a driving time of 364 minutes, is a fully domestic Italian route that crosses no borders. Given the normal climate conditions along the way, battery range is not expected to be significantly impacted by temperature extremes. Practical planning suggests that a single charging stop may suffice for most modern EVs, though drivers of shorter-range models might require two brief stops. The terrain between the Ligurian coast and the northeastern Adriatic includes some hilly sections, which could moderately increase energy consumption, but the abundant station density along the route mitigates any range anxiety.