Busan → Jeju
Latest grid data on this route
- 368 g/kWh
- 13% renewable
- 21°C · normal
- 368 g/kWh
- 13% renewable
- 19°C · normal
Grid: Ember Climate · Weather: open-meteo.com
Range by Weather Condition
In normal weather 24 of 24 EV models complete this route. Estimated charging stops among them: 0 to 3 (median 1).
Select a vehicle above to explore weather-adjusted range.
Assumptions behind these numbers
- Model assumptionStart charge 100%, arrive with 15% in reserve, charge up to 80% at each stop.
- Model assumptionUsable battery: 100% of each vehicle's listed capacity (the listed capacity may be gross or net; no correction is applied).
- Model assumptionSpeed: consumption starts from each vehicle's listed real-world efficiency, times a speed factor of 1.00 (1.00 = no speed adjustment).
- Vehicle dataWeather: each vehicle uses its own hot, normal and cold factor from our vehicle data, so consumption = efficiency x 1.00 / factor. Hot is 25 °C and above, normal is 10-25 °C, cold is below 10 °C.
- Model assumptionCharging speed: average power = min(vehicle peak kW, 150 kW cap) x 0.60 taper, plus 5 min per stop.
- MethodRange, energy and cost all use the same consumption figure. Energy is measured at the battery; charging losses are not included.
- MethodCharging stops are estimated from range and the charging window. They are not verified charging stations.
- Market dataCost: not shown, because no electricity market price is available for South Korea.
- Market dataCO2: energy x grid average carbon intensity of 368 g/kWh (South Korea, Ember Climate, Monthly average, April 2026, older than 45 days, last available value).
More EV Routes in South Korea
See all South Korea routes →Route analysis
The 405-kilometer route from Busan to Jeju in South Korea presents a manageable drive for most modern EVs, with a total drive duration of 421 minutes. The climate in Busan is normal, so no significant range reduction from temperature is expected, though Jeju’s climate data is not provided. Practical implications include planning the ferry schedule, as the charging infrastructure on both sides appears adequate for the distance. Drivers should verify that their vehicle’s range comfortably covers the gap between charging stations, especially if the ferry crossing itself consumes battery time.